Skip to main content
usedby

As published on mabl.com. Checked by usedby on Oct 9, 2026.

What happened

Stack Overflow's engineering team uses mabl to automate testing of its Teams (private Stack Overflow) product, which had previously relied on manual testing. They build reusable test flows, run mabl tests as part of their CI/CD and engineering workflows, and plan to extend use to product teams and other parts of the platform.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and Stack Overflow, not ours.

The Stack Overflow team had been relying on manual testing for the Teams product for some time but realized they could do a much more effective job by bringing in test automation.

From the page. mabl.com

So mabl obviously, came to the top of the list very easily.

Meredith Hatzenbuehler, Software Engineer focused on automated software testing, Stack Overflow. Source

What the story claims, and what we checked

What we compared with the page.

  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Stack Overflow.
  • Stack Overflow uses mablCheckedConfirmed line.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

1B+“1B+ Simultaneous viewers”Miris uses CoreWeave. Same industry: DevTools & Infrastructure50%of production time savedMiro uses Runway. Same industry: DevTools & Infrastructure2–3 minutes“Individual products published in 2–3 minutes”RevenueCat uses Photoroom. Same industry: DevTools & Infrastructure