Skip to main content
usedby
Search tools, companies

How Xima uses QA Wolf

20%

“20% more time spent on feature engineering”

As published on qawolf.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.

What happened

Xima uses QA Wolf to build, run and maintain its automated end-to-end tests, replacing an in-house Cypress suite and manual regression testing. This frees its developers from writing and maintaining tests so they can focus on product features.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Xima, not ours.

  • 3“Avoided hiring 3 additional QA engineers”
  • 95%“Converted 200+ tests—95% of workflows—from Cypress to Playwright in 4 months‍”

Developers that were spending 1–2 days each sprint writing automated tests for the next release can now focus on the product—work they actually want to do.

From the page. qawolf.com, captured Oct 7, 2026

I would definitely recommend QA Wolf for any software that has multiple modules that have to integrate together or have to work with third-party APIs.

Ed St. Louis, VP of Engineering, Xima. Source, captured Oct 7, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.

  • The figure: 20%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Xima.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Xima.
  • Xima uses QA WolfCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

$600K+/year“Offset the need to hire six QA engineers, saving $600K+/year.”Autotrader uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolfnearly 100%“the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months”Bubble uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf86%“Drata secured 86% faster QA cycles”Drata uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf