Who uses QA Wolf?
Agentic end-to-end testing platform and managed service that writes Playwright and Appium tests. qawolf.com
39
companies use QA Wolf
39 companies use QA Wolf. 5% are in DevTools & Infrastructure. Confirmed or observed customers include Doordash, Figma, and Rivian. 32 of them are confirmed by a published case study, quote or press release.Latest check Oct 7, 2026: 39 of 39 companies checked, from 29 public sources.
- Category
- Code Quality & Security
- Customers by proof
- 32 confirmed, 7 observed
- Top industry
- DevTools & Infrastructure, 5% of customers
- Security
- SOC 2 Type II, HIPAASource: trust.qawolf.com, checked Oct 7, 2026
- Most similar
- CodeRabbit, 1 shared customer
- Website
- qawolf.com
What QA Wolf does
QA Wolf uses AI agents to map an application's workflows, generate deterministic Playwright and Appium test code and run tests in parallel across web, Electron, iOS and Android. Teams can use the platform themselves or buy Coverage as a Service, where QA Wolf creates, maintains and investigates tests with human-verified bug reports. Tests stay exportable as open-source code.
Written by usedby from qawolf.com.
Main features
Common uses
Works with
39 companies use QA Wolf
Every company below links to the public page that shows it uses QA Wolf. Open a row to see the dated capture.
Customers over time: appears once we have six months of archived captures.
| Company | Industry | Proof |
|---|---|---|
 Doordash | Logistics & Supply Chain | |
 Figma | DevTools & Infrastructure | |
 Rivian | Automotive Manufacturing | |
 Grafana Labs | Data & Analytics | |
 7Shifts | — | |
 86 Repairs | — | |
 Autotrader | Marketplace | |
 Brilliant | — | |
 Bubble | — | |
 Chief | — |
Is QA Wolf right for your company?
See what companies in your industry use, from the companies we track. Pick your industry.
Of the 126 DevTools & Infrastructure companies on usedby, 2 are listed as QA Wolf customers. 19 use only another Code Quality & Security tool.
- QA Wolf only, 2%
- QA Wolf and another tool in Code Quality & Security, 0%
- Another tool in Code Quality & Security only, 15%
- No Code Quality & Security tool we can see, 83%
These are companies usedby tracks because a public page names them, often QA Wolf's own customer page. It is not a market share. A company counts once, whatever the number of tools it uses.
What customers report
Results as published by QA Wolf and its customers. Each one links to its dated source. We quote, we do not score.
95%automated test coverage
PadletVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026nearly 100%test coverage of core features
BubbleVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
40%more developer time to focus on building
MakersPlaceVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
75%end-to-end test coverage reached within four
VividlyVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
20%more time for developers each week, spent on feature engineering
XimaVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
$642K/yearsavings from doubling E2E test coverage
GUIDEcxVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
$480K+/yrannual savings versus building in-house QA
VestaVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
$500K/yrsaved in QA engineering and infrastructure costs
RegalVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
$200K/yearsavings from offsetting two QA engineers
The Black TuxVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026$600K+/yearQA engineering costs offset
AutotraderVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
$600K/yearQA engineering and infrastructure costs offset
ShopmonkeyVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026
25%more productive engineering time not waiting for QA
SpringbukVendor case studyCaptured Oct 7, 2026The test parallelization and 24/5 bug reporting is great but it’s table stakes for us. The real value of QA Wolf for us, was their ability to integrate with the team. They took the time to learn the product, they write new test suites as features are being developed, and they’re as invested in our success as we are.Beyond the time and focus that was freed up, the real benefit of QA Wolf is that we can test far more than we were able to test before—and more than we realistically ever would have been able to do—which has led to a much more stable and reliable application.Before you buy QA Wolf
What QA Wolf publishes on the points buyers check first, each with its source and check date.
| Security | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA | trust.qawolf.com, checked Oct 7, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Data processing terms | A data processing agreement is available. | trust.qawolf.com, checked Oct 7, 2026 |
Questions to ask in your demo
- Which of your customers look like us, by industry and size?
- What does a pilot cost, and what decides the move to a full contract?
- Where is our data stored, who can access it, and is it used to train models?
- How does QA Wolf work with the tools we already use?
QA Wolf alternatives
Tools compared with QA Wolf most often, with the customers they share.
| Tool | Customers | Shared with QA Wolf | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
 CodeRabbit48 customers, 1 shared | 48 | 1 | QA Wolf vs CodeRabbit |
 Sonar53 customers, 0 shared | 53 | 0 | QA Wolf vs Sonar |
 mabl40 customers, 0 shared | 40 | 0 | QA Wolf vs mabl |
 Snyk33 customers, 0 shared | 33 | 0 | QA Wolf vs Snyk |
 Greptile25 customers, 0 shared | 25 | 0 | QA Wolf vs Greptile |
Questions about QA Wolf
Who uses QA Wolf?
39 companies use QA Wolf, including Doordash, Figma, and Rivian.
Which industries use QA Wolf?
The industries with the most QA Wolf customers are DevTools & Infrastructure (2), Sales Tech & CRM (2), and Automotive Manufacturing (1).
What are the alternatives to QA Wolf?
The tools compared with QA Wolf most often are CodeRabbit (48 customers, 1 shared), Sonar (53 customers, 0 shared), mabl (40 customers, 0 shared), and Snyk (33 customers, 0 shared). See all QA Wolf alternatives.
How does usedby know who uses QA Wolf?
Each company is linked to a public page that names it: QA Wolf's customer page, a published case study, a press release or a job post. We save each page with a dated capture and check it again on each run. A company leaves the list only after three checks in a row that no longer find it, and at least 14 days after it was last seen. A company with a published case study or quote is never removed automatically.
What do confirmed, observed and signal mean?
Confirmed (32): a case study, a named quote or a press release. Observed (7): QA Wolf shows the company on its own pages, for example a logo wall. Signal (0): a job post shows the company’s employees use QA Wolf, the weakest proof. Every level counts as a customer, and each line shows its level.
How current is this list?
The most recent check was on October 7, 2026, and 39 of 39 companies on this list have been checked so far. A company leaves the list only after three checks in a row that no longer find it, and at least 14 days after it was last seen. A company with a published case study or quote is never removed automatically.
Changes and sources
New customers
No new customer yet. Tracking of QA Wolf started on October 7, 2026. New customers appear after two complete checks of its pages.