15%
“Padlet's PMs get 15% more time each week”
As published on qawolf.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.
What happened
Padlet uses QA Wolf to automate and maintain end-to-end regression tests for its web app, replacing a no-code testing tool and manual testing. QA Wolf manages the test suite and reports only verified bugs.
Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Padlet, not ours.
- 95%“Automated test coverage went from less than 10% to over 95%”
- 5–6 hours“Product leadership was spending 5–6 hours a week triaging the no-code tool they were using”
Product leadership was spending 5–6 hours a week triaging the no-code tool they were using—which was only covering 5–10% of their application. By managing their test suite and only reporting verified bugs, Padlet’s leadership can focus on innovating and making an impact.
Beyond the time and focus that was freed up, the real benefit of QA Wolf is that we can test far more than we were able to test before—and more than we realistically ever would have been able to do—which has led to a much more stable and reliable application.
What the story claims, and what we checked
We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.
- The figure: 15%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Padlet.
- The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Padlet.
- Padlet uses QA WolfCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
- The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.
More stories
Same company, same tool or same industry.
