Skip to main content
usedby
Search tools, companies

How Bubble uses QA Wolf

nearly 100%

“the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months”

As published on qawolf.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.

What happened

Bubble, a no-code app builder, works with QA Wolf to build end-to-end test coverage for its platform. This lets its small engineering team catch regressions without taking developers off feature work or hiring QA engineers.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Bubble, not ours.

  • 1,400“1,400 automated tests kept Bubble from popping”

Between QA Wolf’s test suite, and the automated tests that Bubble had previously built out, the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months. With that coverage, Bubble could ship faster and with higher confidence that the changes would add value and not break existing functionality.

From the page. qawolf.com, captured Oct 7, 2026

We were able to focus on building, hiring, and hitting the goals we set for ourselves. Honestly, you were one of the smoothest vendors we’ve ever worked with.

Allen Yang, VP Product, Bubble. Source, captured Oct 7, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.

  • The figure: nearly 100%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Bubble.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Bubble.
  • Bubble uses QA WolfCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

$600K+/year“Offset the need to hire six QA engineers, saving $600K+/year.”Autotrader uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf86%“Drata secured 86% faster QA cycles”Drata uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf$642K/year“Doubling GUIDEcx’s existing E2E test coverage saved more than $642K/year”GUIDEcx uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf