Skip to main content
usedby

75%

“Vividly reached 75% test coverage within four months”

As published on qawolf.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.

What happened

Vividly, a trade management software company for CPG businesses, partnered with QA Wolf to build and run end-to-end test automation in place of slow, error-prone manual testing. This lets its QA engineers focus on performance, load, and exploratory testing while the old system stays covered during a product refactor.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Vividly, not ours.

  • 2-4 days“As a small start-up, Vividly was frustrated with their error-prone manual testing that would take 2-4 days to complete, draining their team of time and resources.”

With .5% UAT and regression test coverage, Vividly was desperate for a new solution. By partnering with QA Wolf, Vividly reached 75% test coverage within four months.

From the page. qawolf.com, captured Oct 7, 2026

Knowing there is a team of engineers that is effectively an extension of my team to help build out end-to-end tests is very useful.

Brian Wu, DevOps Team Lead, Vividly. Source, captured Oct 7, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.

  • The figure: 75%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Vividly.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Vividly.
  • Vividly uses QA WolfCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

$600K+/year“Offset the need to hire six QA engineers, saving $600K+/year.”Autotrader uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolfnearly 100%“the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months”Bubble uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf86%“Drata secured 86% faster QA cycles”Drata uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf