Data Methodology: Adoption data is based on public tech stack disclosures, job postings, case studies, and verified enterprise reports analyzed by UsedBy.ai. Showing 35 verified enterprise adoptions. More data being indexed continuously.
Decision Guide
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on real enterprise adoption patterns
UsedBy Exclusive Data
Industry Adoption Patterns
See which industries prefer each tool based on real adoption data
Live Person by Industry
Telecommunications21%
E-commerce & D2C11%
Management Consulting11%
EdTech & E-learning11%
Banking & Mortgages11%
Clay by Industry
Clay is popular in Marketing Tech with 25% adoption
Marketing Tech25%
Cybersecurity19%
DevTools & Infrastructure13%
Artificial Intelligence13%
Sales Tech & CRM6%
Real User Feedback
What Users Say
Testimonials from verified enterprise users
“"On top of our successes to date with LivePerson's Conversational AI and platform, LLMs and generative AI hold enormous promise to help us scale seamless and personalized conversations even further," ...”
Bhavesh Panchal
Head of Channels and Digital Adoption, TalkTalk
No testimonials available yet
Live Person vs Clay: Your Questions Answered
Live Person has higher enterprise adoption with 19 companies using it, compared to 16 for Clay. This suggests stronger market validation for Live Person.
While our data doesn't show companies currently using both tools together, they serve different purposes and could potentially complement each other.
Live Person is particularly strong in Telecommunications (21% of adopters), while Clay dominates in Marketing Tech (25%). Choose based on your industry's prevailing stack.
For startups, consider: Live Person offers freemium pricing, while Clay uses freemium pricing. Both are validated by enterprise use, ensuring scalability as you grow.
Related Comparisons
Explore more head-to-head matchups in this category
