The use case: how Brilliant deploys QA Wolf
Brilliant uses QA Wolf to automate testing of its interactive, game-like learning app across web and Android, replacing slow manual checks after releases. QA Wolf gives developers and lesson designers fast test results so they can ship without fear of breaking anything.
More reported results
Figures published in QA Wolf’s case study. They are not independently measured by usedby.
Detecting 8–10 bugs per month saving millions of dollars in top-line revenue.
Provided the equivalent testing capacity of 4–5 additional QA engineers.
In the customer’s words
In order to be able to achieve the same coverage that QA Wolf provides, and to account for the necessary redundancy when people get sick or go on vacation, would probably require a minimum of four or five full-time engineers.Other AI tools used by Brilliant
Other public relationships recorded on usedby.
Explore Brilliant’s AI stack
QA Wolf users in EdTech & E-learning
Companies in the same sector, with public evidence.
See all QA Wolf customers
Go straight to the source
Based on QA Wolf’s published case study. We check the public evidence; the results are reported by the vendor.
qawolf.com- Last checked
- Nov 10, 2026
Open source capture What the story claims, and what we checked
What we compared with the page.
- The figure: 5 minutesChecked
Printed word for word on the page, near the name of Brilliant.
- The passage quoted aboveChecked
Copied word for word from the page, near the name of Brilliant.
- Brilliant uses QA WolfChecked
Confirmed line.
- The result itselfNot checked
We quote it; we did not measure it.
Manually testing the application after a release was taking hours, even a full day. During that time, developers and lesson planners were split-focused monitoring the latest deploy while trying to focus on the next piece of work.