$2.8M
“$2.8M annual cost savings from automated chart review”
As published on notablehealth.com, May 2026. Checked by usedby on Oct 9, 2026.
What happened
Castell, a population health services company, uses Notable to automate chart review in the EHR and to submit documentation to payers for care gap attestation. This surfaces actionable data before patient encounters and reports closed care gaps back to payers.
Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Notable and Castell, not ours.
- 70%“70% reduction in chart review time”
- 8,360 hours“saving 8,360 hours of staff time”
- 6.9%“resulting in a 6.9% increase in average closure rate across five care gaps”
- 100,305“100,305 charts reviewed and uploaded for payer care gap attestation”
Since expanding automated chart review to all 468 providers, Castell has offloaded this work to a digital workforce that would otherwise require an additional 47 full time care coordinators to complete.
As a value-based care organization, data accuracy is critical for measuring performance and tracking and reporting patient outcomes. From surfacing care gap information within the EHR prior to a patient encounter, to validating and reporting closed care gaps to payers, Notable enables us to manage all of our population health workflows in one place.
Notable’s intelligent automation platform enables us to utilize data in a meaningful, actionable way. For example, we now have a streamlined way to collect and report patient information, which is typically a major barrier for operationalizing VBC. For so long, our care coordinators were mired in paperwork and data entry. Now, Notable surfaces the right data at the right time to eliminate the many minutes per patient they would normally spend fact-finding in the EHR.
What the story claims, and what we checked
What we compared with the page.
- The figure: $2.8MCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Castell.
- The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Castell.
- The publication dateCheckedRead from the page’s own metadata, never guessed.
- Castell uses NotableCheckedConfirmed line.
- The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.




