Skip to main content
usedby

11 minutes

“Full end-to-end regression cycle in 11 minutes.”

As published on qawolf.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.

What happened

Metronome, a usage-based billing platform, uses QA Wolf to write and maintain its end-to-end regression tests, replacing manual testing by individual engineers. Developers record a short video of each new feature, QA Wolf turns it into tests in the suite, and test coverage is part of Metronome's definition of done.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Metronome, not ours.

  • 4“Increased to 4 fully-tested production deployments per day.”
  • 1%“Less than 1% flake rate.”

We have about 400 tests that run in about 11 minutes, and the flake score is under 1%. We rarely get a false negative failure in QA Wolf, and I was actually quite surprised at how responsive the QA Wolf team was on those tests.

From the page. qawolf.com, captured Oct 7, 2026

We have about 400 tests that run in about 11 minutes, and the flake score is under 1%.

Elia Karagiannis, Product Platform Engineer, Metronome. Source, captured Oct 7, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.

  • The figure: 11 minutesCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Metronome.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Metronome.
  • Metronome uses QA WolfCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

$600K+/year“Offset the need to hire six QA engineers, saving $600K+/year.”Autotrader uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolfnearly 100%“the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months”Bubble uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf86%“Drata secured 86% faster QA cycles”Drata uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf