Skip to main content
usedby

5.39 hours

“Average response time dropped to just 5.39 hours”

As published on humanly.io. Captured by usedby on Oct 3, 2026.

What happened

Mutual of Omaha uses Humanly's automated interviews to screen frontline candidates, replacing manual recruiter phone screens. Candidates complete short interviews on their own time, and the tool integrates with Workday.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Humanly and Mutual of Omaha, not ours.

  • 67.73%“A 67.73% completion rate ensured more candidates made it through screening.”

Manual phone screening stretched time-to-screen to as long as five days, delaying candidate progress.

From the page. humanly.io, captured Oct 3, 2026

It’s just a huge time saver. Candidates can complete the phone screen on their own time instead of having to schedule a specific slot. It’s been a very efficient process for us.

Mandy Campbell, Senior Recruiter, Mutual of Omaha. Source, captured Oct 3, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 3, 2026.

  • The figure: 5.39 hoursCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Mutual of Omaha.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Mutual of Omaha.
  • Mutual of Omaha uses HumanlyCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 3, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

5 days“How DK Security cut 5 days off time-to-hire with automated interviews”DK Security uses Humanly. Another customer of Humanlysix hours“Automated outreach and screening reduced average response time to just six hours”Fleet Feet uses Humanly. Another customer of Humanly2 daysMedian candidate reply timeNoom uses Humanly. Another customer of Humanly