Skip to main content
usedby

$305M

“$305M in savings”

As published on zip.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 8, 2026.

What happened

Snowflake uses Zip as a single intake point for purchase requests, bringing privacy, legal, security and procurement reviews into one automated approval workflow. This replaced fragmented procurement tools and gave the company earlier visibility into spend.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Zip and Snowflake, not ours.

  • $3.7B+“$3.7B+ in spend visible before approval”
  • $11M“$11M of spend rejected early”
  • $6.7 billion“Early visibility on $6.7 billion in spend”

Zip delivered Snowflake a comprehensive intake to pay platform that not only unified procurement processes but also gained enthusiastic company-wide adoption.

From the page. zip.com, captured Oct 8, 2026

We’re finally measuring the whole process for the first time—and the cycles within that process are faster than ever.

Joe Frederick, VP, Procurement & Sourcing, Snowflake. Source, captured Oct 8, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 8, 2026.

  • The figure: $305MCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Snowflake.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Snowflake.
  • Snowflake uses ZipCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 8, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

~1,215 hours“eliminated ~1,215 hours of manual grading per quarter”Snowflake uses Yoodli. Another tool at Snowflake22 days“ADT’s average cycle time is 22 days across all request types”ADT uses Zip. Another customer of Zip95%“Despite hypergrowth, Anthropic achieved 95% policy adoption within the first year.”Anthropic uses Zip. Another customer of Zip