The use case: how State of Oklahoma OMES deploys Celonis
The State of Oklahoma's central finance agency (OMES) uses Celonis Process Intelligence on data from its PeopleSoft ERP to get end-to-end visibility into procurement. It flags non-compliant purchase orders in real time and audits spending across all state agencies.
More reported results
Figures published in Celonis’s case study. They are not independently measured by usedby.
To date, they’ve identified over $174 million in potential savings — just by using state-wide contracts at scale.
Within a few weeks, OMES boiled the process down to 46 days.
The fact that the State of Oklahoma found a solution that was not only 200x more efficient but $11.4 million less expensive is likely thanks to the tech enthusiasm of Jerry Moore.
One example: they’ve redirected six FTEs previously charged with auditing state-issued credit card transactions to other fields, because Celonis can do the job faster, better and more cheaply.
In the customer’s words
With Celonis, we instantly were able to stop wasteful spending by identifying how the spend occurred and where taxpayer dollars were going.Other AI tools used by State of Oklahoma OMES
Other public relationships recorded on usedby.
Explore State of Oklahoma OMES’s AI stack
Other companies using Celonis
Customers across industries, with public evidence.
ABBConfirmed
AccentureConfirmed
Alstom transportConfirmed
AstraZenecaConfirmed
AutodeskConfirmed
B3ConfirmedGo straight to the source
Based on Celonis’s published case study. We check the public evidence; the results are reported by the vendor.
celonis.com- Last checked
- Oct 30, 2026
Open source capture What the story claims, and what we checked
What we compared with the page.
- The figure: 200xChecked
Printed word for word on the page, near the name of State of Oklahoma OMES.
- The passage quoted aboveChecked
Copied word for word from the page, near the name of State of Oklahoma OMES.
- State of Oklahoma OMES uses CelonisChecked
Confirmed line.
- The result itselfNot checked
We quote it; we did not measure it.
Armed with this process intelligence, they also audited the spending of all 122 agencies in just four months. A little reminder: at their previous pace of auditing eight agencies per year, it would have taken them up to 15 years to get the job done.