Skip to main content
usedby

$1M+

“$1M+ saved per year in QA engineering costs”

As published on qawolf.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.

What happened

Thirty Madison uses QA Wolf to build and maintain end-to-end test coverage for web and mobile workflows while replatforming two systems into one after an acquisition. The tests cover patient intake, clinical workflows, and pharmacy delivery, replacing manual regression work and avoiding an in-house QA team.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Thirty Madison, not ours.

  • 10x“200 test cases to 2,000 — a 10x increase — in less than a year”
  • 20%“20% of developer time reclaimed from slow QA cycles”
  • 1–2 days“1–2 days additional capacity per engineer”

By working with QA Wolf instead, Thirty Madison avoided hiring a dedicated QA team—saving an estimated $800,000 to $1.25 million annually.

From the page. qawolf.com, captured Oct 7, 2026

We knew replatforming was going to be a massive lift. And we also knew that any slip in quality could impact patient safety, which is something we can’t compromise on.

Achin Batra, CTO, Thirty Madison. Source, captured Oct 7, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.

  • The figure: $1M+CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Thirty Madison.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Thirty Madison.
  • Thirty Madison uses QA WolfCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

$600K+/year“Offset the need to hire six QA engineers, saving $600K+/year.”Autotrader uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolfnearly 100%“the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months”Bubble uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf86%“Drata secured 86% faster QA cycles”Drata uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf