Skip to main content
usedby

PolyAI or Replicant for inbound calls: telephony, actions, handoff, oversight

Two voice agents compared on phone connection, business actions, human handoff and oversight, with what each vendor publishes and what you must still ask.

18companies identified for PolyAI

30companies identified for Replicant

Public evidence snapshot: Nov 8, 2026

Our read

Pick by the gap you can close fastest. PolyAI publishes a telephony list you can check against your stack today: SIP trunk, Five9, NICE CXone, Genesys Cloud, Amazon Connect, Zoom and others. Replicant shows no telephony list on the pages read, but its security page is more specific on redaction, access control and audit trails. Neither source ranks them on handoff depth, so settle that with a live transfer test on your own platform.

123

PolyAI and Replicant on four shared criteria, as published on vendor product, documentation and security pages.

PolyAI and Replicant on four shared criteria, as published on vendor product, documentation and security pages.
CriterionPolyAIReplicant
Telephony and routingPolyAI
Documented: SIP, Five9, NICE CXone, Genesys, Amazon Connect, more
Replicant
No telephony list on pages read; ask which platforms connect

Unknown, not absent

Business actionsPolyAI
Reservations, tickets, knowledge, CRM; custom APIs and MCP
Replicant
Scheduling, payments, routing described; connector detail not shown

Case studies show tasks, not connectors

Handoff to an advisorPolyAI
Live-agent handoff documented for voice and for chat/SMS

Context fields passed are not listed there

Replicant
Escalation shown in case studies; transfer mechanics not detailed

Product overview gives no transfer detail

Oversight and controlsPolyAI
ISO 27001 and others listed; regional residency; DPA published

Training wording differs between homepage and DPA

Replicant
Automatic redaction, audit trails, RBAC with MFA; SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA

Training off by default; confirm contract wording

Sources
  1. Introduction (docs.poly.ai)
  2. poly.ai
  3. replicant.com
  4. Replicant (usedby.ai)
  5. Polyai (usedby.ai)
  6. Ecsi (replicant.com)
  7. Audibel (poly.ai)
  8. Evive (replicant.com)
  9. Security (poly.ai)
  10. Dpa (poly.ai)
  11. Safety ai security (replicant.com)

Telephony: PolyAI lists its connectors, Replicant leaves the question open

If you already run a PBX or a contact-center platform, start here. PolyAI's integration documentation groups its telephony options under call routing, transfers and live-agent handoffs: a generic SIP trunk, forwarding an existing number to a new PolyAI number, Five9 through a multi-tenant SIP trunk, NICE CXone through its Signal API, Twilio, Amazon Connect, Genesys Cloud BYOC, Zendesk Talk, Dialpad, and Zoom Phone and Zoom Contact Center. The docs say each of these is available from Integrations in Agent Studio.

Replicant's homepage presents phone, SMS and chat automation but does not name compatible telephony platforms. The directory record lists Genesys, Five9, NICE inContact, Cisco, Talkdesk and Ujet among its integrations, without saying which of them carry live calls. That is unknown, not absent. NJ TRANSIT's Access Link paratransit service offers one data point: the vendor case study says it added Replicant to complement its phone system rather than redo it, but it does not name the connection method.

12456

Business actions: what each agent does inside your systems

PolyAI's docs say the agent can look up reservations, create tickets and retrieve knowledge articles during calls. Connectors cover Salesforce, Zendesk, HubSpot, Dynamics 365, OpenTable and Epic, and anything exposing an MCP server can be added. For other platforms you define HTTP endpoints and call them from Python functions. Two vendor case studies show the shape: Hawksmoor connected the agent to its OpenTable availability so callers see the same table inventory as a reservationist, and Carter's agent looks up available discounts for price adjustments and sends refunds to the original payment method.

Replicant describes agents built from existing conversation data that combine language models with deterministic reasoning for business decisions. In its case studies, ECSI's agents authenticate callers, capture intent, and resolve or route calls for tax forms, refunds and loan servicing. NJ TRANSIT automates ride-status checks and cancellations. Evive Brands uses agents for scheduling, lead qualification, FAQs and after-hours calls. These stories describe tasks, not the connectors behind them, so ask which of your back-office systems each task reads and writes.

12678910

Handoff to an advisor: documented platforms versus documented outcomes

PolyAI documents handoff at two levels: live-agent transfer inside the telephony integrations, and chat or SMS handoff to Salesforce, Zendesk, NICE CXone, Amazon Connect, Genesys, Webex or Five9. In Audibel's vendor case study, the agent collects name, phone number, zip code and intent, then passes the call to a live agent with context. Carter's reports that its chat agent, not its voice agent, made more than 3,000 live-agent transfers with zero queuing over Black Friday weekend. On voice, Carter's added callback scheduling for callers who prefer a human later.

For Replicant, the evidence is outcome-level. ECSI's case study says escalated calls reach agents with a summary so they do not repeat steps, and Evive Brands describes complex conversations passing to human agents. Which platforms receive the transfer, and whether it is warm or cold, is not stated in those pages. PolyAI's integration page names platforms but does not list which context fields reach the agent desktop either, so both vendors owe you the same demonstration.

1891011

Oversight and data terms: where the two sources differ

Replicant's security page is the more detailed on day-to-day controls. It describes automatic redaction of personal and payment data across AI interactions, transcripts, analytics logs and QA workflows, granular permissions with audit trails, role-based access with multi-factor authentication, and analysis of every conversation for traceability. It lists SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS and HIPAA. The directory records training use as off by default, while the page wording is stronger, so get the exact term in the contract.

PolyAI's homepage lists SOC 2+ Type 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and GDPR, encrypted SIP, SSO and role-based access, data residency in the US, UK, EU or APAC, PII redaction and human-in-the-loop controls. Its security page adds AWS hosting and third-party penetration testing, and a data processing agreement is published. One tension to resolve rather than assume: the homepage says data is never trained on without opt-in, while the DPA grants PolyAI a licence to use communications data, such as recordings and transcripts, to create analytics data and improve its services. Ask how those two statements fit together.

3121314

What to test before a pilot (editorial suggestion)

These are our recommendations, not vendor features. First, route a real call from the agent into your own queue and look at what the human sees. Second, ask each vendor to show a transcript where sensitive passages were removed, and who can open recordings and logs. Third, request written wording on training and analytics use of your calls. Customer stories, such as Hawksmoor or ECSI, illustrate workflows; they do not prove that a function will work on your stack.

1314

Method and limits

2026-11-08

This dated snapshot counts distinct companies in public customer evidence. CONFIRMED means a case study, named testimonial or press source; DECLARED means the company itself told usedby; OBSERVED means a vendor listing; SIGNAL means a job post. All four count, but their strength differs. Removed and unlevelled lines are excluded. Examples are a capped selection verified within 90 days. Vendor facts are sourced records checked within 60 days. Coverage is uneven and missing evidence is unknown. These figures measure neither market share nor product performance; capture dates are not adoption dates.

Named companies, tool by tool

Public evidence snapshot: Nov 8, 2026

Logos of the companies our public sources name, strongest proof first.

Companies identified by usedby

ToolCase studies, testimonials, pressVendor listsTotal
PolyAI11718
Replicant111930
Distinct companies per tool and proof level, as of Nov 8, 2026. Source: usedby, public sources.
See the documented examples

This snapshot describes our coverage, not market share or product quality. Missing evidence does not mean non-use. Dates record our checks, not when adoption started.

Sources

  1. Introductiondocs.poly.ai
  2. replicant.com
  3. Safety ai securityreplicant.com
  4. usedby · PolyAIusedby.ai
  5. usedby · Replicantusedby.ai
  6. NJ TRANSIT · Replicantreplicant.com
  7. Hawksmoor · PolyAIpoly.ai
  8. Carter's · PolyAIpoly.ai
  9. ECSI · Replicantreplicant.com
  10. Evive Brands · Replicantreplicant.com
  11. Audibel · PolyAIpoly.ai
  12. PolyAIpoly.ai
  13. Securitypoly.ai
  14. Dpapoly.ai

Questions

How long did published deployments take to go live?

Vendor case studies give different scopes, so treat them as illustrations, not a benchmark. Fogo de Chão's study says PolyAI trained and localized the agent, integrated OpenTable and launched a first pilot within a two-week window; Hawksmoor rolled out site by site. Evive Brands says its first Replicant brand took about four months and a later brand under four hours.

What if my telephony platform is not on PolyAI's list?

The docs describe a generic SIP trunk and number forwarding, plus custom HTTP APIs called from Python functions and MCP servers. They also mention a managed-services section for integrations PolyAI's team handles. Whether your platform works that way is a question for a technical session.