Skip to main content
usedby

Exa vs TypeSafe AI: who uses which

Customers, public proof and the companies that use both.

On usedby, 20 companies use Exa and 5 use TypeSafe AI. 1 company uses both, including Glean. Exa leads among the DevTools & Infrastructure companies on usedby that use either tool.Latest check Nov 12, 2026: 25 of 25 public lines checked. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. A company on both tools counts at any proof level, and a job post on one side is marked as such.

Who uses Exa, TypeSafe AI, or both

Every company with a public proof for at least one of the two tools.

19

listed for Exa only

1

company uses both

4

listed for TypeSafe AI only

On usedby, 19 companies are listed for Exa only, 4 are listed for TypeSafe AI only and 1 uses both, out of the 24 companies listed for at least one. An absent listing does not prove non-use.

20customers
13 confirmed 1 declared 6 observed

Where it lands

DevTools & Infrastructure5
Artificial Intelligence2
Sales Tech & CRM2

TypeSafe AI

Open TypeSafe AI
5customers
1 confirmed 2 declared 2 observed

Where it lands

Artificial Intelligence1
Data & Analytics1
DevTools & Infrastructure1

Who uses both

Companies with a public line on both tools, at any proof level: the strongest proofs come first, and a job post is marked.

Companies that use both Exa and TypeSafe AI
CompanyFirst public proof, ExaFirst public proof, TypeSafe AI
GleanOn or before Nov 2026On or before Nov 2026

Side by side

Facts from our data and from each vendor's public pages. Each line says where it comes from.

Vendor facts checked: Exa, 0 of 4; TypeSafe AI, 3 of 4. Missing facts remain unverified, not absent features.

ExaTypeSafe AI
Customersusedby, latest check Nov 12, 2026Exa: 20 (13 confirmed, 1 declared, 6 observed)TypeSafe AI: 5 (1 confirmed, 2 declared, 2 observed)
Top industryusedby, latest check Nov 12, 2026Exa: DevTools & Infrastructure (5)TypeSafe AI: No clear lead
PricingNo verified public evidenceTypeSafe AI: Jev 1.14: $0.042 per Mtokdocs.typesafe.ai, checked Oct 27, 2026
SecurityNo verified public evidenceTypeSafe AI: SOC 2 Type IItrust.typesafe.ai, checked Oct 27, 2026
Your dataNo verified public evidenceTypeSafe AI: Not used to train models by default.typesafe.ai, checked Oct 27, 2026
Data residencyNo verified public evidenceNo verified public evidence
WebsiteExa: exa.aiTypeSafe AI: typesafe.ai

What customers report

Results as the vendor or the customer published them, with the source and the date.

Exa

More than 9.1M Search requests to date

HockeyStack

Vendor case study, exa.ai, captured Nov 12, 2026

Read the story

More than 7.2M Search requests to date: 11x uses Exa Search for high-volume prospect and account research.

11X

Vendor case study, exa.ai, captured Nov 12, 2026

Read the story

TypeSafe AI

with 88% lower cost and roughly 50% faster task completion time

Jack & Jill

Vendor case study, typesafe.ai, captured Oct 27, 2026

Read the story

Questions about Exa and TypeSafe AI

Which is used more, Exa or TypeSafe AI?

Exa has more customers on usedby: 20 against 5 for TypeSafe AI.

Do companies use both Exa and TypeSafe AI?

Yes. 1 company uses both on usedby, including Glean.

Who uses Exa?

20 companies on usedby, each with the public page that shows it. See who uses Exa.

Who uses TypeSafe AI?

5 companies on usedby, each with the public page that shows it. See who uses TypeSafe AI.

How does usedby count customers?

A company counts when a public page shows it: a vendor's customer page, a case study, a press release or a job post, most saved with a dated capture. Every line is a customer, at one of four proof levels: confirmed, declared by the company itself, observed or signal (a job post, the weakest). A company counts as using both tools when it has a line on each, at any level; the list shows the strongest proofs first and marks job posts.