2.5x
“mabl proved to be 2.5x faster than Selenium for test creation”
As published on mabl.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.
What happened
Workday's marketing team uses mabl to automate testing of its marketing portal, including authoring component tests on the Adobe Experience Management platform, replacing manual testing and Selenium scripts. Automated regression suites run at the end of each sprint and build verification suites run after each build.
Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and Workday, not ours.
- 102 hours“Increased efficiency: mabl proved to be 2.5x faster than Selenium for test creation, enabling the team to create 246 tests in 4 PIs and save 102 hours.”
- $1,250“Cost savings: mabl has led to approximately $638 in savings per PI and $1,250 per release.”
- $20,000“In 2023 alone, Workday saved approximately $20,000 by catching bugs before they reached production.”
- 13 issues“Improved product quality: With increased test coverage and faster feedback loops, 13 issues were identified and resolved early on, preventing costly production bugs.”
Increased efficiency: mabl proved to be 2.5x faster than Selenium for test creation, enabling the team to create 246 tests in 4 PIs and save 102 hours.
What the story claims, and what we checked
We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.
- The figure: 2.5xCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Workday.
- The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Workday.
- Workday uses mablCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
- The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.
More stories
Same company, same tool or same industry.
