Skip to main content
usedby

Glean vs Tavily: who uses which

Customers, public proof and the companies that use both.

On usedby, 59 companies use Glean and 19 use Tavily. 1 company uses both, including MongoDB. Glean leads among the Fintech & Payments companies on usedby that use either tool.Latest check Nov 12, 2026: 72 of 78 public lines checked. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. A company on both tools counts at any proof level, and a job post on one side is marked as such.

Who uses Glean, Tavily, or both

Every company with a public proof for at least one of the two tools.

58

listed for Glean only

1

company uses both

1 of them is listed through a job post on one side, the weakest proof.

18

listed for Tavily only

On usedby, 58 companies are listed for Glean only, 18 are listed for Tavily only and 1 uses both, 1 of them through a job post on one side, out of the 77 companies listed for at least one. An absent listing does not prove non-use.

59customers
30 confirmed 2 declared 23 observed 4 signals

Where it lands

Fintech & Payments6
Data & Analytics5
Media & Publishing5

Recently publicly listed customers

UniqusOct 31
19customers
9 confirmed 1 declared 9 observed

Where it lands

Artificial Intelligence2
DevTools & Infrastructure2
Legal & Compliance2

Who uses both

Companies with a public line on both tools, at any proof level: the strongest proofs come first, and a job post is marked.

Companies that use both Glean and Tavily
CompanyFirst public proof, Glean
MongoDBjob post for GleanJob post, Oct 2026

By industry

Which tool the companies on usedby use, by industry. Shares of the companies on usedby that use Glean, Tavily or both: a share of the companies on usedby, not of the market.

IndustryListed for Glean onlyBothListed for Tavily only
Fintech & Payments7 companies on usedby
86%0%14%
Legal & Compliance6 companies on usedby
67%0%33%
Artificial Intelligence5 companies on usedby
60%0%40%
Data & Analytics5 companies on usedby
80%20%0%
Marketing Tech5 companies on usedby
80%0%20%

Listed for Glean onlyBothListed for Tavily only

More common with Glean

  • Fintech & Payments6 of the 7 Fintech & Payments companies on usedby that use either tool use Glean.
  • Legal & Compliance4 of the 6 Legal & Compliance companies on usedby that use either tool use Glean.
  • Artificial Intelligence3 of the 5 Artificial Intelligence companies on usedby that use either tool use Glean.

Source: every usedby line, from confirmed proofs to job-post signals (the weakest proof level).

Side by side

Facts from our data and from each vendor's public pages. Each line says where it comes from.

Vendor facts checked: Glean, 3 of 5; Tavily, 0 of 5. Missing facts remain unverified, not absent features.

GleanTavily
Customersusedby, latest check Nov 12, 2026Glean: 59 (30 confirmed, 2 declared, 23 observed, 4 job-post signals)Tavily: 19 (9 confirmed, 1 declared, 9 observed)
PricingGlean: Work AI Platform · AWS Marketplace · Custom quoteaws.amazon.com, checked Nov 13, 2026No verified public evidence
SecurityGlean: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, HIPAAglean.com, checked Nov 13, 2026No verified public evidence
Your dataNo verified public evidenceNo verified public evidence
Data residencyNo verified public evidenceNo verified public evidence
IntegrationsGlean: Slack, Google Drive, Jira, Confluence, SharePoint, GitHub, Salesforce, Asana, Box, Dropbox, Zendesk, Workdayglean.com, checked Nov 13, 2026No verified public evidence
WebsiteGlean: glean.comTavily: tavily.com

What customers report

Results as the vendor or the customer published them, with the source and the date.

Glean

saving more than 1,500 hours monthly

Super

Vendor case study, glean.com, captured Nov 11, 2026

Read the story

With 92% adoption, Glean helps Upside employees find what they need

Upside

Vendor case study, glean.com, captured Nov 11, 2026

Read the story

Tavily

the number of customers using Ocean's agents grew 1.5x

Ocean

Vendor case study, tavily.com, captured Nov 12, 2026

Read the story

An estimated 20 hours of scraper work saved each month

Astelia

Vendor case study, tavily.com, captured Nov 12, 2026

Read the story

Evidence for your decision: Glean

Source observations. Check the required plan and conditions before choosing.

Documented tasks

McCarthy HoldingsAutomate internal business workflows
With Glean's agent capabilities, McCarthy teams are now building and deploying purpose-built agents that automate complex, data-intensive workflows.

SourceVENDOR CASE STUDYCaptured:

NileAutomate internal business workflows
Glean has enabled teams across Nile to build customized agents for their most important workflows, as well as bring other applications and AI tools into one agentic ecosystem.

SourceVENDOR CASE STUDYCaptured:

Choice criteria

Integration: BoxSourced observation

Plan: Unknown

Easily integrate 275+ apps across ecosystems out of the box.

SourceVendor pageChecked:

Integration: Google ChatSourced observation

Plan: Unknown

Conditions: Product scope needs verification

Product: glean

Setup and limits: Named plan, contract entitlement, connector scopes, permissions, volume limits and regional eligibility remain unknown.; Documented only; not_tested. No authenticated vendor operation executed.; Named integration listing only; operation semantics and data direction are not established.

Google ChatNativeCommunication

SourceDocumented · Not testedChecked:

Questions about Glean and Tavily

Which is used more, Glean or Tavily?

Glean has more customers on usedby: 59 against 19 for Tavily.

Do companies use both Glean and Tavily?

Yes. 1 company uses both on usedby, including MongoDB.

Who uses Glean?

59 companies on usedby, each with the public page that shows it. See who uses Glean.

Who uses Tavily?

19 companies on usedby, each with the public page that shows it. See who uses Tavily.

How does usedby count customers?

A company counts when a public page shows it: a vendor's customer page, a case study, a press release or a job post, most saved with a dated capture. Every line is a customer, at one of four proof levels: confirmed, declared by the company itself, observed or signal (a job post, the weakest). A company counts as using both tools when it has a line on each, at any level; the list shows the strongest proofs first and marks job posts.