Cursor97 customers
Used by 97 companies on usedby. 4 also use Warp. Compare Warp and Cursor
Source: cursor.com, latest capture Oct 2, 2026.
8 of the 17 Warp customers on usedby also use another tool on this list. The tools most often used by the same companies are Cursor (4 shared, 97 customers in all), Factory (2 shared, 18 customers in all), and Replit (1 shared, 31 customers in all).Latest check Oct 8, 2026: 288 of 322 public lines checked. Customer counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Shared customers are counted on confirmed or observed lines on both tools.
8of 17
Warp customers also use another tool on this list
Cursor shares the most companies with Warp: 4 companies use both.
Ranked by shared customers
Tools of the same or a competing category, from another vendor, used by at least one company that also uses Warp. A shared customer has a confirmed or observed line on both tools.
| # | Alternative | Shared with Warp | Customers | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cursor | 4 | 97 | Compare Warp vs Cursor |
| 2 |  Factory | 2 | 18 | |
| 3 |  Replit | 1 | 31 | Compare Warp vs Replit |
| 4 |  CodeiumMostly IT Services & System Integration (4) | 1 | 18 | |
| 5 |  BitoMostly Airlines & Aviation Services (3) | 1 | 16 | |
| 6 |  Qodo | 1 | 11 | |
| 7 |  ClineMostly IT Services & System Integration (3) | 1 | 9 |
Factory18 customers
Used by 18 companies on usedby. 2 also use Warp.
Source: factory.ai.
Replit31 customers
Used by 31 companies on usedby. 1 also uses Warp. Compare Warp and Replit
Source: replit.com, latest capture Oct 7, 2026.
Codeium18 customers
Used by 18 companies on usedby, 4 of them in IT Services & System Integration. 1 also uses Warp.
Source: codeium.com.
Bito16 customers
Used by 16 companies on usedby, 3 of them in Airlines & Aviation Services. 1 also uses Warp.
Source: bito.ai, latest capture Oct 4, 2026.
Qodo11 customers
Used by 11 companies on usedby. 1 also uses Warp.
Source: qodo.ai, latest capture Oct 5, 2026.
Other AI Code Editors tools on usedby
Same category, with public customers, but no company named with Warp yet.
GitHub copilot40 customers
Augment Code28 customers
Cognition26 customers
Tessl11 customers
Switch signals
A company that left one vendor's page and appeared on another's.
No switch publishedA switch needs a departure from one vendor's page, seen on two checks in a row, and a dated arrival on another. usedby does not publish departures yet, so no switch shows here.
By industry
Which of these tools the companies on usedby use, by industry. Each row counts the companies of that industry on usedby that use at least one of these tools.
| Industry | Most used | Next | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| DevTools & Infrastructure | Cursor36% |  Warp18% | 28 companies |
| Fintech & Payments | Cursor36% | Augment Code14% | 14 companies |
| IT Services & System Integration | Codeium31% | Cline23% | 13 companies |
| Artificial Intelligence | Cursor33% | Warp33% | 12 companies |
| HR & Recruiting | Cursor63% | Qodo25% | 8 companies |
Read the first row as: among the 28 DevTools & Infrastructure companies on usedby that use one of these tools, 36% use Cursor. Shares can add up to more than 100% because some companies use two tools.
Questions about Warp alternatives
Which tool shares the most customers with Warp?
Cursor: 4 companies use both on usedby. Cursor has 97 customers in all. See who uses Cursor.
Do Warp customers use other tools too?
8 of the 17 Warp customers on usedby also use another tool on this list. Cursor shares the most: 4.
Which of Warp and its alternatives do DevTools & Infrastructure companies on usedby use?
Among the 28 DevTools & Infrastructure companies on usedby that use one of these tools, 36% use Cursor. Warp comes next, with 18%.
Which of Warp and its alternatives do Fintech & Payments companies on usedby use?
Among the 14 Fintech & Payments companies on usedby that use one of these tools, 36% use Cursor. Augment Code comes next, with 14%.
How does usedby rank Warp alternatives?
Only tools of the same or a competing category, from another vendor, count. They are ranked by shared customers: companies with a confirmed or observed line on both tools, from public pages, most with a dated capture. Tools with no shared customer are listed apart. Customer counts include every proof level, job-post signals included.