2.07 weeks
“CodeRabbit saved an estimated 2.07 weeks of reviewer time during a recent 90-day period.”
As published on coderabbit.ai. Captured by usedby on Oct 6, 2026.
What happened
trivago's Aegis web team uses CodeRabbit to run an automated first-pass review on pull requests. Authors address its findings before requesting human review, so human reviewers can focus on architecture and product logic while CodeRabbit reinforces codebase conventions and catches functional errors.
Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of CodeRabbit and Trivago, not ours.
- 66.7%“Peak critical-severity acceptance rate of 66.7%”
- 43.4%“Developers accepted 43.4% of 1,620 CodeRabbit review comments.”
- 1,160“CodeRabbit supported 1,160 merged pull requests in the measured view.”
- 7.18 hours“Median time to merge was 7.18 hours, with a median of 1.67 hours between the last commit and merge.”
CodeRabbit saved an estimated 2.07 weeks of reviewer time during a recent 90-day period. It handled a thorough first pass so human reviewers could concentrate on architecture, product logic, and the broader implications of a change.
CodeRabbit doesn’t get tired. It doesn’t skip over things. It doesn’t miss things.
What the story claims, and what we checked
We compared the story with its live page on Oct 6, 2026.
- The figure: 2.07 weeksCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Trivago.
- The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Trivago.
- Trivago uses CodeRabbitCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 6, 2026.
- The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.




