Skip to main content
usedby

$750K

“saving more than $750K/year in QA engineering”

As published on qawolf.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.

What happened

Salesloft uses QA Wolf to build, maintain and run its automated end-to-end regression tests, replacing earlier no-code, developer-driven and manual testing approaches. The tests run in parallel on every pull request.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Salesloft, not ours.

  • 300+“Executing 300+ tests in parallel on every PR.”
  • 45 minutes“With QA Wolf, those tests can be completed in less than 45 minutes and they can be run on every PR.”

Salesloft estimates that it would take up to seven full-time QA engineers to provide the same service that QA Wolf provides today—to build, maintain, concurrently run, and respond to failures within strict SLAs.

From the page. qawolf.com, captured Oct 7, 2026

QA Wolf’s parallel run infrastructure lets us run the test suite so much faster than we could ever have run them on our own.

Ann Rumney, Staff QA Program Manager, Salesloft. Source, captured Oct 7, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.

  • The figure: $750KCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Salesloft.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Salesloft.
  • Salesloft uses QA WolfCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

40%“it ramped the team 40% faster and improved time to fill by 11%”Salesloft uses BrightHire. Another tool at Salesloft$600K+/year“Offset the need to hire six QA engineers, saving $600K+/year.”Autotrader uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolfnearly 100%“the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months”Bubble uses QA Wolf. Another customer of QA Wolf